| | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Padre Island Is Now Preparing For The Largest Beach Recovery Project In Texas History
881 Views ::
13 Comments ::  |
| South Padre Island Is Now Preparing For The Largest Beach Recovery Project In Texas History A pocket of sand in the Gulf of Mexico, one of three possible offshore sand sources found by a recently completed first phase of a study sponsored by South Padre Island and its Economic Development Corporation, could yield tens of millions of cubic yards of material for Island beaches. The first phase cost approximately $70,000, said Richard Franke, president of the Economic Development Corporation, which leads the Island’s beach restoration efforts. An area in the Laguna Madre near the U.S. Coast Guard Station could provide about a million cubic yards of sand, but it’s difficult to transport to the beach, Franke said. Another area near the south jetty of the Brownsville Ship Channel could supply perhaps another million cubic yards of sand, Franke said.
“But the main sand source is going to be directly in front of South Padre Island, in 50 to 70 feet of water maybe one to three miles offshore,” Franke said. “That’s the source that could have tens of millions of cubic yards of sand available for the beach.” Phase two of the study will start in October and will sample the sand and determine exact quantities, which could lead to permitting and seeking grant sources, Franke said.
The work could lead to a beach restoration “like we’ve never had before,” Franke said, adding that past projects have added approximately 300,000 cubic yards of sand every two years while the upcoming project would provide two to three million cubic yards at once.
“It’s a huge difference,” Franke said. “You can renourish the entire beach not just one section.” Areas with high beach erosion could one day “see 200 feet of beach out there,” Franke said. City Manager Dewey Cashwell said the work would qualify as the largest beach restoration project in Texas history.
South Padre Island has a history of ambitious beach restoration projects. In June 2005, the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association named the Island as one of four American beaches worthy of its national preservation award. Mayor Robert N. Pinkerton Jr. would later travel to Washington, D.C., to meet with U.S. Rep. Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Corpus Christi, to claim the prize.
“The Top Nourished Beach award was created in 2001 as a way of highlighting nourished beaches,” said Mayor Harry Simmons of Caswell Beach, North Carolina and President of ASBPA. “As Americans begin to flock to our nation’s coastline during the beach season, most beach-going Americans don’t even realize they may be enjoying a nourished beach.”
Beach re-nourishment is an obvious top priority, said Alderwoman Tara Rios Ybarra, who also sits on the Cameron County Coastal Taskforce, which formed this year in response to South Padre Island’s beach erosion.
The taskforce is completing a document to state how Cameron County communities will cooperate on coastal issues, not just beach erosion, providing a regional consensus to get state and federal help through legislation and possible grants. This fall, South Padre Island will start hauling sand again from Highway 100 rights-of-way, Rios Ybarra said.
“Our beach is our economy,” Rios Ybarra said. “Even though I feel some people in the public don’t see us working on it, this is at the top of the list of what the (Board of Aldermen) think is important. “
Why do Beaches Erode?
The simple answer is they do not have enough sand. However, the causes are different in different parts of the country.
- On the West Coast, beaches are sandstarved when river dams block the flow of sand.
- Eastern beaches often lack sand because inlets or navigation projects interrupt sand’s along-shore movement.
- All beaches suffer from storms and other natural events that cause erosion. Things as disparate as storm-driven waves or a simple change in an offshore sandbar may cause one coastal area to lose sand while another gains.
What can we do about it?
For decades, people have tried putting everything on the beach to stop erosion including the proverbial kitchen sink. During the 20th century, when coastal engineering and coastal geology came into their own, science played more of a role in fighting erosion.
Still, there is no one magical answer that works everywhere. Often, it takes a combination of solutions.
- Land use regulations: While requiring coastal buildings to be set back and elevated doesn’t slow erosion, it does lessen its impact on buildings. That’s why most states have enacted special coastal land use regulations.
- Abandonment: Wholesale retreat is not practical in many areas. But, in minimally populated areas with low property values, it may make sense to buy property and remove infrastructure.
- Structures: There are two kinds that “draw the line” in the sand – literally. Seawalls run parallel to the shore to protect the property behind them. Unfortunately, they don’t add sand to the system. Other structures (groins and jettys) run perpendicular to the shoreline and keep sand from moving down the beach. They can work well only when sand is already being added to the beach.
- Beach restoration: Adding sand to the beach to replace what’s been lost is the closest we’ve come to solving the problem. Coastal scientists have years of experience with beach restoration projects and have learned that adding sand in the right quantities, properly engineered and maintained, can make a beach last forever.
Why do we care about beaches? Our beaches are an American treasure in terms of storm protection, recreation, the economy and the environment. - Recreation: Beaches are our longest national park, with more recreational use than all our national parks combined. Unlike many parks, however, beaches are accessible to metropolitan areas. Right now, public beach access must be provided in order for a beach project to receive any federal funding. That’s a great motivation to keep our beaches accessible to everyone.
- Storm protection: Studies show that a healthy beach protects the properties behind it – and the roads, buildings and sewer or water lines. That means fewer flood insurance claims and disaster assistance requests. It also means a lot less misery for coastal citizens.
- Environment: When we lose the beach, we lose invaluable natural habitat. Sea turtles have difficulty nesting on an eroding beach, and those nests are more susceptible to predators. On a narrow or nonexistent beach, birds have no place to nest or feed. Unique beach ecosystems can be destroyed when there isn’t enough sand to support them.
- Economic: America’s coast is a magnet for people who want to live and play on the beach. More than 50 percent of Americans live within 50 miles of the coast. Healthy beaches are a major draw for tourists from across the nation and the world, generating billions of dollars in revenues annually and creating thousands of jobs.
UTB/TSC Beach Restoration Plan For South Padre Island
South Padre Island leaders are considering a plan from the University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College that could help create a continuous dune line on the town’s beaches.
Seaweed like the one shown here can be used to restore Sand Dunes.
|
A continuous dune line-without gaps between dunes-helps protect property from high tides and swells from tropical storms by acting as a wall of sand. Also, filling gaps protects dunes by making it more difficult for waves to erode the piles of sand at their edges.
Last week, Alderwoman Courtney Hayden brought to the Board of Aldermen a plan recommended by Dr. Elizabeth Heise, an assistant professor of geology at the UTB-TSC.
“This is something that our Beach and Dune Task Force has worked hard on [to develop the dunes] for protection from a storm,” Hayden said. “And by working with the University of Texas at Brownsville… there is a plan that has come forward.”
The plan includes collected masses of seaweed that were placed at dunes during the spring and then stirring the masses weekly to help the organic material degrade into compost. That material would be used as a “rich base for new dunes,” according to Hayden’s proposal.
“Much of the seaweed raked and piled last spring has not composted because it has not been able to ‘breathe,’” states a town document explaining the plan. “If it is removed from the dunes and properly composted, it can provide a viable base for new dunes, encouraging rapid growth of dune plants because of its nutrients and water content. This means less sand is required to build new dunes.”
South Padre Island does not have access to enough beach quality sand to create a continuous dune line with sand alone, officials said.
Compost would be piled in the gaps of the dune system and then covered with three to four inches of sand, Hayden said, “as opposed to trying to build a six-foot high dune that is totally made of sand and can blow away.”
The seaweed would create stability and retain moisture, meaning plants would not need to be irrigated, Hayden said.
“We have all this seaweed and it’s free, and it’s become kind of a nuisance,” Beach and Dune Task Force member Alita Bagley said. “Finding a beneficial use for seaweed would just be a wonderful thing for South Padre Island.”
The plan would also move plants now growing on some dunes to a greenhouse at the university where the plants will be cultivated until time to replant. Those plants could be taken whenever property owners get permission from the town to lower the heights of existing dunes.
University students would map the beach to identify all gaps in the dune line and “begin a pilot project to find ways to best harvest and use deposits of seaweed,” Hayden stated in her proposal to the Board of Aldermen.
Also, the university would provide speakers to attend civic groups to educate South Padre Island’s community on the importance of the dune system.
“We have some places [along the beach] where people are asking ‘please’ to have dunes placed in front of their property,” Hayden said. “And then we have some folks who are not too enthusiastic about it at this point.” |
|
|
|
|
| Comments | |
By
Herb Stark @
Wednesday, October 03, 2007 2:46 PM | |
|
By
stevef @
Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:16 AM | |
Very good article! Kudos to the city of SPI. I am glad to hear that the sand from the Hwy. 100 Right of Way is being used. It would seem to be the most economical source of sand because of the ease of retrieval (we already have a road to it) and the short distance back to the beach areas of reclamation. Also, it keeps the Right of Way cleared. I wonder how much sand could be obtained if it were to be gained from extending Hwy. 100 north to open up some new areas for future development? The composting of the seaweed is also a great idea. |
|
|
|
By
SusanF @
Monday, October 22, 2007 3:56 PM | |
this article tells it all, can't wait to see the progress with project. Go for it. Beaches are very cheap "therapy". |
|
|
|
By
Ed Prenger @
Monday, October 22, 2007 5:10 PM | |
I have promoted the use of seaweed as a composting agent for dune restoration for the last ten years. I would love to be involved with this project, as there are other things that need to be addressed with regard to compost. |
|
|
|
By
Steve Finley @
Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:52 AM | |
You can reach Alderwoman Courtney Hayden at 956-761-8740 or 956-761-6456. |
|
|
|
By
John @
Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:41 PM | |
I visit the island about once a year, I noticed significantly less beach this year. I was thinking of buying property, but without a nice beach, I am less enthusiastic. I also noticed the beach was a lot less clean this year, lots of trash everywhere. |
|
|
|
By
Kenya @
Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:41 AM | |
Most of the gulf coast beaches are experiencing erosion and I'm glad to hear that SPI leaders are trying to gather ideas and come up with a good restoration plan. |
|
|
|
By
ken @
Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:52 AM |
South Padre Island will get about $3 million from the state to rebuild beaches that have washed into the Gulf of Mexico.
The grant is one of several from the Texas General Land Office, which awarded more than $17 million to improve beaches over the next two years. Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson made the announcement at a conference on coastal issues in Galveston.
More than two-thirds of the money awarded to the island, about $2.1 million, will pay to move sand from another source, possibly offshore, said Mayor Bob Pinkerton. Officials are still working on finding the sand, and once they do, they will pipe it to the island and spread it with bulldozers, he said.
“We’re not tied to one particular source,” Pinkerton said.
The restoration will likely begin at the north end of town, near the La Quinta Inn, and proceed south for another quarter mile to half mile, he said.
Pinkerton said GLO officials have assured him they will be flexible with how the money can be used. It must be spent by Aug. 31, 2009.
Another $600,000 awarded Tuesday will pay for the island to continue working with the Texas Department of Transportation to move sand from highway rights-of-way to the beach, Pinkerton said. And $300,000 will go to study possible sources of sand offshore, he said.
Erosion causes problems for home and business owners near the beach, and makes beaches less accessible to the public. Texas relies on beaches to attract tourists, and rebuilding coastlines protects important utilities like water lines, said Jim Suydam, spokesman for the GLO.
“They’re not cheap, but it’s cheaper to do them than to not do them,” he said of the restoration projects.
The largest grant awarded Tuesday was for $13.5 million to Galveston to restore three miles of beaches.
Pricey re-nourishment projects are the only way to keep beaches alive since rivers are dammed, preventing sediment from making it to the coast to naturally build up beaches, said Pat Suter, chairman of the Coastal Bend Sierra Club.
But no matter how much money is spent, the beach will disappear at nature’s whim, she said.
“People need to realize that re-nourishment is temporary,” she said. “One storm and it’s going to take it away.” |
|
|
|
By
Debbi @
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:02 PM |
I am eagerly approaching retirement in approximately 4 years....I am researching communities in Texas and have come across this site. As an environmentalist the issues you have been facing in the South Padre Island area is nothing different from most other of the Great Lakes in the north. With true commitment the dunes can be replenished. I was particularly interested in the note from John (Oct 24th) mentioning his yearly visits and his loss of enthusiasm in possibly purchasing property due to the poor beach conditions. This gives me further reason to research this area...retirement means continued involvement. |
|
|
|
ByTexas Real Estate Center @
Friday, November 02, 2007 6:18 PM |
With its comparatively inexpensive property and natural assets, the Texas coast has become a popular spot for investors, second-home buyers and retirees.
Communities trying to meet the demand for housing face several challenges, including preserving their towns' personalities and the coast's natural integrity.
For more information about issues facing coastal developers, read By the Sea by editor Brian Pope" in the current issue of The Texas Real Estate Center's Tierra Grande at:
http://recenter.tamu.edu/tgrande/vol14-4/1832.html
|
|
|
|
By
Jimmy B @
Wednesday, November 14, 2007 8:35 AM | |
Who notices beach anymore? This place is a parking lot where it isn't a street. |
|
|
|
By
Arthur @
Sunday, November 25, 2007 7:32 PM |
I would LOVE to see the beach improved. I wouldn't expect much local help though, as we can't even find a way to keep the existing beach clean.
A few years ago I was in Galveston, and the beach was just a few feet from the sea wall, almost completely gone, hardly big enough for a lawn chair. If there is any grant money around to fix the national beaches, I assume places like Galveston are going to get much more than South Padre.
With all the high-dollar property in this town, and the HUGE property tax receipts, why can't we afford to rebuild the beach by ourselves? Where exactly does all that tax money go? Few things are more important than our beach. We shouldn't have to be begging for a one-in-four chance to get some kind of government grant. I don't think there are going to be many federal grants around anyway, as GWB seems to have spent all the money on a useless Iraq war. That money would be much better spent at home, doing useful stuff like restoring the beaches.
This is not to suggest that all of the SP beach is bad. Look at the beach in front of the Raddison, it's HUGE, one of the best on the island. Acres of beautiful white sand. I don't know if they did this themselves, or if it is all natural. One thing for sure, it's very nice. It's almost as if they simply knocked down the dunes to create more usable beach. Without the dunes I bet they're the first beach front property to flood in the next hurricane.
To me, the whole problem of beach erosion and trash is just a sign of inefficient local government. |
|
|
|
By
Barbara Crisci @
Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:23 PM | |
I currently own some sand in the north section that is within the 200 ft mean tide swell. I would like to know if the restoration will encompass the north end of the island as well and how far reaching northward will it extend?
|
|
|
Click here to post a comment |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|